Blog de curiosidades, inspiraciones y temas en general de Carlos E. Mijares MD. Blog for Odd writings and general themes by Carlos E Mijares MD. Good Luck!
There has been a massive surge in the African invasion of Europe across the Mediterranean, with 11,000 sub-Saharans being plucked from the sea and brought to Italy within a 48-hour period from October 4 to 5, 2016.
The Africans came from Nigeria, Eritrea, Guinea, Gambia, Sudan, Ivory Coast, and Somalia, according to the Italian coast guard.
On Wednesday, October 5, European navy ships carried out more than 30 operations off the Libyan coast, taking at least 4,700 Africans off boats just a few miles from the North African coast.
The previous day, at least 6,000 Africans, packed into barely seaworthy rubber dinghies, were also picked up off the Libyan coast.
The invaders were brought to Italy, where European Union and Italian officials tried to identify them—a near impossible task given the fact that they mostly have no papers anyway, and those that do, have long since thrown them away.
They were fingerprinted in the hope that they could later be identified.
Meanwhile, they are accommodated in invader centers in Italy—but most then immediately move on to try and claim “asylum” in Germany or other European countries which have better welfare handouts.
The narrative that Africans are fleeing “war and poverty” in Africa is one which is regularly used by the controlled media when “explaining” what they call the “migrant crisis.”
In reality, Africans are not fleeing “war and poverty” but their own societies. By moving en masse to Europe, they will be bringing this misery and poverty with them, not “escaping” it.
Africa is one of the most naturally mineral- and agriculturally-rich continents on the planet, and should therefore be one of the world’s richest.
Instead, it is immersed in dire poverty and backwardness, not because of its environment, but because its population is unable to create any sort of wealth or progress by themselves.
Secondly—and just as importantly—there are significant psychological differences between the races, caused by differing morphological makeups in both body and brain structure.
These psychological differences account for different behavioral patterns, different levels of social responsibility, and even mental health issues—such as dramatically higher levels of schizophrenia among Africans in particular.
These psychological differences—which are ultimately genetic in origin—are also the cause of the high levels of crime and social disturbances associated with black populations all over the world.
Ultimately, these racial differences are the cause of the African invasion of Europe. Unable to even subsist on their own, Africans are taking advantage of European race-denying liberalism to move to Europe to demand the benefits of European civilization, as they are unable to create it by themselves.
Under the present race-denying liberal worldview, there is therefore no end to the “migrant crisis” (as the controlled media describes it). All 1.3 billion Africans will seek a “better life” as supposedly on offer in Europe if they are granted the opportunity.
At their current invasion levels, Africans are moving to Europe by the millions—and there is no end in sight.
Unless Europeans drop their race-denying liberalism—and decisively halt and reverse the nonwhite invasion—it is a matter of demographic certainty that Europe and European civilization will be destroyed under the Third World flood.
Surely after all this time, when are the authorities going to return all those that have no papers, are there any politicians really listening to the people anywhere. Just try to get off a plane without the right paperwork anywhere else. Of course, these people come from a background that refuses to accept that their countries are at fault and they lack the backbone to sort them out.
As long as the vessels act as a ferry service rather than returning these migrants back to the north African coast, they will continue to come. Has no one suggested this? To force the issue all migrants dropped onto Italy or any other coastal country should be promptly put on trains to Berlin, after all it was Merkel who invited them all to come without giving anyone else a choice, let her deal with the problem.
The Italian authorities supporting the genocide of Europe. Traitorous scum! The illegals should all have been turned back or else. Were they all scientists and brain surgeons benefiting Europe?
The mass invasion has been left too late by the enablers. People are awakening rapidly, and it’s only a matter of time before the military also awaken.
So the shortest distance between Italy and Libya is 1,104 MILES. The Muslim Invaders are being launched in rubber dinghies from a perfectly safe country, knowing that our Treasonous Fabian governments will FORCE our own naval ships & crews to waste their time and scarce funding to travel 1000 MILES to the Libyan coast to pick up Invaders, bring them to Italy, palm them off onto other European countries including Britain, and give them free housing and welfare benefits, while they lounge around in coffee houses, deciding who to gang-rape next, and waiting for the signal to attack us all.
I say let them come, as long a I can find a like minded large group of intelligent, non pacifist, heterosexual whites willing to effectively become modern day Boers and march in and commandeer a large swathe of yet to be properly utilised Africa. Throw out the rubbish and prosper. Europe and America are spent forces and will only flex their facial muscles and the UN has been a laughing stock since I was a kid and that was many moons ago. China and Russia are realists and they’ll be looking to trade not whine.
Come on those out there still possessed of a pioneering spirit, lets amass an invasion force and show the retards how to do it properly.
Not even waiting for them to wash ashore on Italy, but picking them up literally, off the Libyan coast. The coast guard is doing such a “good job” protecting Italy from invaders . . . by trying to figure out their “nationalities.”
Wow, and our national security depends on these type of idiots.
They’re black. That;s all you need to know. Therefore, keep them out of Europe.
Don’t obey the orders from above, if they are harmful to your people.
Perhaps Europe should simply swap homes with Africa. They all come here and we all go there. We build a new and prosperous homeland, they turn Europe into a cesspit.
Bryn,
They not only lack the backbone to sort out their countries. They first, and foremost of all lack the brains to sort them out. And they are lazy as hell, if you’ve ever employed or worked with them. The would much prefer to sit there and watch the world go by while we are looking around for something to do. Neither they or many of our people understand the basics of this. They have an IQ that in our western nations is “borderline delayed or impaired.” Now THEY don’t know that, which is why they become angry when they can’t seem to get where we can get. Our countries are made for us, to our specifications. We should never be afraid to say this and to point it out so they cannot keep getting away with blaming us and accusing us of any fault for why they don’t get ahead. For God’s sake, they shouldn’t even be here. Only a truly sick society would accept hordes of them coming here, knowing they will rob, assault, and rape our culture until it and it’s people are a shadow of the brilliance the world once followed.
Bryn, it seems many people ask when are the “authorities” going to do this or going to do that.
However, what you must realise is that these “authorities” ie the government, are either blackmailed puppets, or outright scoundrels taking money from their Judaic overlords. I think we all know the type of people who are colloquially known as effin bastards. Well these effin bastards only care about their own status in the small number of years they are on earth, they don’t even see that their own children or at least distant relatives will be directly affected by their actions. When these bastards slowly percolate to the top of society, we will see the types of problems we are having today, because they can be easily bought, sold, and traded.
In my view there is far too much emphasis on “status” “money” and “power”, however this is instilled into us by the Jewish controlled media. The reason for this is because it denatures the human side of our people and turns us into wage slaves, working for their usurious dollar (look up usury, basically it is interest rates from a central bank which we have in Australia)
Many, many countries (the vast majority of countries), have strict immigration laws, designed to prevent the genocide of their own people.
In White countries, there is a concerted, top down driven agenda of bringing in non-Whites in order to wash our people away. This is known as genocide and is a very serious crime.
This mass world-wide genocide of the White people began in earnest in the 1960s. Conveniently, this was when social engineering programs were enacted proclaiming the new age of love and inclusion for all. New drugs were pushed, advertised as liberating the people, however what they actually did was poison many minds and turn them into self hating Whites.
If you do some research into all the laws enacted in the 1960s regarding mass immigration, you will find a common racial treat. If you want to do some more research, in the USA in the year 1913, which really isn’t that long ago, all these 4 organisations were created: The Federal Reserve (Jewish Central Bank of Usury), The IRS (Tax Department, to siphon off the workers), The FBI (Tax enforcement with weapons) and the ADL (Jewish run shaming organisation that calls White and only White people Nazi Racist KKKs who speak publicly about the Jewish led genocide of our people.)
Treason laws in Australia: Section 80.1 clause (e) engages in conduct that assists by any means whatever, with intent to assist, an enemy;
(f) engages in conduct that assists by any means whatever, with intent to assist:
(i) another country; or
(ii) an organisation;
Anyone with open eyes can see that the government is assisting the enemy by bringing in non-Whites into our nations who will eventually harm our genetic survival at the very least, and most probably cause massive grief and hardship to our people if we don’t stand up and thus become disenfranchised.
At the very worst we could see outright slaughters of the last Whites as we are seeing in South Africa and the complete genocide of Whites in Hait, where every single White was chased down and slaughtered.
The traitors working for the monied up Jews and White elites are all engaged in treason, by the very definition of the word in the Australian Criminal Code.
The maximum penalty for treason is life imprisonment, and that should be enacted against the whole lot of them. Huge trials need to be created and all funders of our genocide need to be imprisoned as well.
It is a massive international conspiracy being played out in plain sight. We are being stifled because of the brainwashing of the holy HOAX (holocaust), and name calling (racist, bigot, nazi, xenophobe, ad infinitum), all designed to attack our survival mechanism so that we can be completely destroyed.
I understand this is hard to take, but having done the research I know what I am saying is the truth.
Here is a video of a Rabbi saying that Muslims are his brothers and that together Jews and Muslims are bringing the end to the “Old” Europe. I am not exaggerating, watch:
What he means is the Jews and Muslims are committing genocide against Europeans.
There is no possible way violence can solve this problem before the vast majority of people are awakened to the indisputable facts.
The enemy organised (military, police) while they are probably mostly White in White countries, and are probably good people, are unfortunately completely brainwashed and will attack any uprising. They are in the system completely, they want their paychecks and have no-way out.
The only way out of this mess is the mass spreading of factual information, factual propaganda, and whatever we can do at the present time to spread the truth.
Of course, it is always a good idea to mentally and physically prepare for what is coming.
***As for those who only seek comfort merely, they do not deserve to exist (O. Splenger)
No
one can have looked forward to the national revolution of this year with
greater longing than myself. The sordid Revolution of 1918 I detested from its
first day, for it was the betrayal by the inferior part of our people of that
strong, live part which had risen up in 1914 in the belief that it could and
would have a future. Everything of a political nature that I have written since
then has been directed against the forces which had entrenched themselves, with
our enemies' help, on the mountain of our misery and misfortune in order to
render this future impossible. Every line that I wrote was meant to contribute
to their overthrow, and I hope that it has done so. Something had to come in one form or another to
release the deepest instincts in our blood from that load, if we were, like
others, to have a voice and to act in
the coming world-crises and not merely be their victim. The great game of world
politics is not over. Only now are the highest stakes being played for. Every
living nation must rise to greatness or go under. But the events of this year
allow us to hope that the decision in our case has not yet been made - that we,
as in Bismarck's day, shall sooner or later again be subjects and not mere
objects of history. The decades in which we live are stupendous - and
accordingly terrifying and void of happiness. Greatness and happiness are
incompatible and we are given no choice. No one living in any part of the world
of today will be happy, but many will be able to control by the exercise of
their own will the greatness or insignificance of their life-course. As for
those who seek comfort merely, they do not deserve to exist.
The
man of action is often limited in his vision. He is driven without knowing the
real aim. He might possibly offer resistance if he did see it, for the logic of
destiny has never taken human wishes into account. But much more often he goes
astray because he has conjured up a false picture of things around and within
him. It is the great task of the historical expert
(in the true sense) to understand the facts of his time and through them to
envisage, interpret, and delineate the future - which will come whether we will
or no. An epoch so conscious of itself as the present is impossible of
comprehension without creative, anticipating, warning, leading criticism.
I
shall neither scold nor flatter. I refrain from forming any estimate of those
things which are only just coming into being. True valuation of an event is
only possible when it has become the remote past, and the definitive good or bad results have long been facts: which is to
say, when some decades have passed. No ripe understanding of Napoleon was
possible before the end of last century, and even we can as yet have no final
opinion about Bismarck. Facts alone stand firm, judgments waver and change. In
sum, a great event has no need of a contemporary estimate. History itself will
judge it when its contemporaries are no longer living.
So
much, however, can be said already: the national revolution of 1933 was a
mighty phenomenon and will remain such in the eyes of the future by reason of
the elemental, super-personal force with which it came and the spiritual
discipline with which it was carried through. Here was something Prussian
through and through, just as was the uprising of 1914, which transformed souls
in one moment. The German "dreamers" stood up with a calm imposing naturalness
to open a way into the future. But all the more must those who took part
realize that this was no victory, for opponents were lacking. The force of the
rising was such that everything that had been or was still active was swept
away in it. It was a promise of future
victories that have yet to be won by hard fighting, and merely cleared the
ground for these. The leaders bear the full responsibility therefor, and it is
for them to know, or to learn, the significance of it all. The task is fraught
with immense dangers, and its sphere lies not within the boundaries of Germany
but beyond, in the realm of wars and catastrophes where world politics alone
speak. Germany is, more than any other country, bound up with the fate of all
the others. Less than any can it be directed as though it were a thing unto itself.
And, moreover, it is not the first national revolution that has taken place
here - there have been Cromwell and Mirabeau - but it is the first to occur in
a politically helpless and very dangerously situated land, and this fact
enhances incalculably the difficulty of its tasks.
These
tasks are, one and all, only just emerging, are barely grasped and not solved.
It is no time or occasion for transports of triumph. Woe betide those who
mistake mobilization for victory! A movement has just begun; it has not reached
its goal, and the great problems of our time have been in no wise altered by
it. They concern not Germany alone, but the whole world, and are problems not
of a few years, but of a century.
The
danger with enthusiasts is that they envisage the situation as too simple.
Enthusiasm is out of keeping with goals that lie generations ahead. And yet it
is with these that the actual decisions of history begin.
The
seizure of power took place in a confused whirl of strength and weakness. I see
with misgiving that it continues to be noisily celebrated from day to day. It
were better to save our enthusiasm for a day of real and definitive results -
that is to say, of successes in foreign
politics, which alone matter. When these have been achieved the men of the
moment, who took the first step, may all be dead - or even forgotten and
scorned, until at some point posterity recalls their significance. History is
not sentimental, and it will go ill with any man who takes himself
sentimentally!
In
any movement with such a beginning there are many possible developments of
which the participants are not often fully aware. The movement may become rigid
from excess of principles and theories; it may go under in political, social,
or economic anarchy, or it may double back upon itself in futility. In Paris in
1793 it was definitely felt "que ça
changerait." The intoxication of the moment, which often ruins coming
possibilities at the outset, is usually followed by disillusionment and
uncertainty as to the next step. Elements come into power which regard the
enjoyment of that power as an event in itself and would fain perpetuate a state
of things which is tenable for moments only. Sound ideas are exaggerated into
self-glorification by fanatics, and that which held promise of greatness in the
beginning ends in tragedy or comedy. Let us face these dangers in good time,
and soberly, so that we may be wiser than many a generation in the past.
But
if a stable foundation is to be laid for a great future, one on which coming
generations may build, ancient tradition must continue effective. That which we
have in our blood by inheritance - namely, wordless ideas - is the only thing
which gives permanence to our future. "Prussianism" (Preußentum), as I called it years ago, is important - it is this,
precisely, that has just been tested
- but "Socialism," of whatever description, is not. We need educating up to the
Prussian standard, which manifested
itself in 1870 and 1914 and still sleeps in the depths of our soul as a
permanent potentiality. It is to be reached only through the living example and
moral self-discipline of a ruling class, not by a flow of words or by force.
The service of an idea demands mastery of ourselves and readiness for inward
sacrifices to conviction. To confuse this with the intellectual compulsion of a
program is to be ignorant of the whole issue. And this brings me back to the
book: Prussianism and Socialism, [1]
in which, in 1919, I began to point out this moral necessity without which
there can be no permanent building. All other nations of the world have
inherited a character from their past.
We had no educative past and have therefore still to awaken, develop, and train
the character which lies dormant in our blood.
(1.
Oswald Spengler, Preußentum und Sozialismus, Munich: C. H. Beck.)
The
work of which this volume is the first part is written with the same object. I
do as I have always done. That is, I offer no wish-picture of the future, still
less a program for its realization - as is the fashion amongst us Germans - but
a clear picture of the facts as they are and will be. I see further than
others. I see not only great possibilities but also great dangers, their origin
and perhaps the way to avoid them. And if no one else has the courage to see and
to tell what it is he sees, I mean to do so. I have a right to criticism since by means of it I have repeatedly
demonstrated that which must happen
because it will happen. A decisive
series of facts has been set in train. Nothing that has once become a fact can
be withdrawn - we are all thereafter obliged to walk in the particular
direction, whether we will or not. It would be short-sighted and cowardly to
say no. What the individual will not do, that History will do with him.
But
to say yes presupposes comprehension, and this book is here to help in
comprehension. It is a danger-signal. Dangers are always there. Everyone who
acts is in danger. Danger is life itself. But those who link the fate of States
and nations with their own must meet these dangers seeingly - and to see requires possibly the most courage of all.
The
present book arose out of a lecture: Germany
in Danger, [2] which I delivered at Hamburg in 1929, without meeting with
much comprehension. In November 1932 I began to develop the theme, still in
terms of the existing situation in Germany. By the 30th January 1933 it was
printed up to page 106. I have altered nothing
in it, for I write not for a few months ahead or for next year, but for the
future. What is true cannot be made null by an event. The title alone I have
changed, so as to avoid misunderstandings. It is not the national seizure of
power which is a danger; the dangers were there - some of them dating from
1918, others from much further back - and they still persist, since they cannot
be got rid of by an isolated event which before taking effect against them must
undergo a long development in the right direction. Germany is in danger. My fear for Germany has not grown less. The March
victory was too easy to open the eyes of the victors to the extent of the
danger, its origin, and its duration.
(2. Deutschland in Gefahr, Munich: C. H.
Beck.)
No
one can know what forms, situations, and personalities will arise out of this
upheaval, or the reactions which may result from outside. Every revolution
makes the external situation of a country worse, and that fact alone requires
statesmen of Bismarck's order to deal with it. We stand, it may be, close
before a second world war, unable to gauge the distribution of forces or to
foresee its means or aims - military, economic, revolutionary. We have no time
to limit ourselves to home politics; we have to be "in form" to deal with any
conceivable occurrence. Germany is not an island. If we fail to see our
relation to the world as - for us in particular - the important problem, fate - and what a fate! - will submerge us
without mercy.
Germany
is the key country of the world, not
only on account of her geographical situation on the borders of Asia (which is
today the most important continent in world policy), but also because Germans
are still young enough to experience world-historical problems, to form them
and solve them, inwardly, while other
nations have become too old and rigid to do more than raise defences. But in
tackling great problems, as in other
matters, it is the attack that holds the greater promise of victory.
It is of this that I have written. Will it have the effect I hope for?
Munich, July 1933.
I never expected to witness the slow suicide of a country, a civilization. I suppose nobody does.
Let me tell you, there’s nothing epic about it. We who have the
privilege of travel often look down in satisfaction at the ruins of
ancient Greece; the Parthenon lit up in blues and greens. The acropolis.
The Colosseum in Rome. We walk through the dusty streets of Timbuktu
and gaze in wonder at the old mud mosques as we reflect on when these
places had energy and purpose. They are not sad musings, for those of us
who are tourists. Time has polished over the disaster. Now all that is
left are great old buildings that tell a story of when things were
remarkable – not of how they quietly fell away. “There was no reason,
not really,” we tell each other as we disembark our air-conditioned
buses. “These things just happen. Nothing is forever; and nobody is at
fault. It’s just the way of the world,” our plastic wine glass in hand.
Time ebbs and flows, slowly wearing away the foundations of a
civilization until it collapses in upon itself – at least that’s what we
say to comfort ourselves. There’s nothing to do about it. These things
can’t be stopped. They just are.
This is what people will say in a hundred years, a thousand years
about Caracas, Venezuela. Or Maracay, or Valencia, or Maracaibo. Those
great sweltering South American cities with their malls and
super-highways and skyscrapers and colossal stadiums. When the
archeologists of the future dredge the waters of the Caribbean and find
the remains of sunken boats; putting them on display in futuristic
museums to tell of the time when this place had hosted a civilization.
Ruins of great malls filled with water and crocodiles – maybe the
ancient anaconda will have retaken their valleys; maybe the giant rats
that wander the plains will have made their abodes in the once-opulent
homes of the oligarchs – covering the tiles and marble with their
excrement. “There was nothing that could have been done,” the futuristic
tourists will also say. “The country declined – and vanished – it’s the
way things go.”
We tourists are wrong.
I know, because I have watched the suicide of a nation; and I know
now how it happens. Venezuela is slowly, and very publically, dying; an
act that has spanned more than fifteen years. To watch a country kill
itself is not something that happens often. In ignorance, one presumes
it would be fast and brutal and striking – like the Rwandan genocide or
Vesuvius covering Pompeii. You expect to see bodies of mothers clutching
protectively their young; carbonized by the force or preserved on the
glossy side of pictures. But those aren’t the occasions that promote
national suicide. After those events countries recover – people recover.
They rebuild, they reconcile. They forgive.
No, national suicide is a much longer process – not product of any
one moment. But instead one bad idea, upon another, upon another and
another and another and another and the wheels that move the country
began to grind slower and slower; rust covering their once shiny
facades. Revolution – cold and angry. Hate, as a political strategy.
Law, used to divide and conquer. Regulation used to punish. Elections
used to cement dictatorship. Corruption bleeding out the lifeblood in
drips, filling the buckets of a successive line of bureaucrats before
they are destroyed, only to be replaced time and again. This is what is
remarkable for me about Venezuela. In my defense – weak though it may be
– I tried to fight the suicide the whole time; in one way or another. I
suppose I still do, my writing as a last line of resistance. But like
Dagny Taggert I found there was nothing to push against – it was all a
gooey mess of resentment and excuses. “You shouldn’t do that.” I have
said. And again, “That law will not work,” and “this election will bring
no freedom,” while also, “what you plan will not bring prosperity – and
the only equality you will find will be in the bread line.” And I was
not alone; an army of people smarter than me pointed out publically in
journals and discussion forums and on the televisions screens and
community meetings and in political campaigns that the result would only
be collective national suicide. Nobody was listening.
So I wandered off. I helped Uganda recover after a 25 year civil war –
emptying out the camps and getting people back living again. I helped return
democracy to Mali, and cemented a national peace process. I wrote three
novels. I moved, and moved, and moved again. I loved my wife; we took
vacations. We visited Marrakesh, and Cairo, and Zanzibar and Portugal
and the Grand Canyon. We had surgeries. I had a son. We taught our son
to sit up, to crawl, to walk and to run; to sing and scream and say
words like “chlorophyll” and “photosynthesis”. To name the planets one
by one, to write his name.
All the while the agonizingly slow suicide continued.
And always, in the early morning over coffee I open my computer to
document, if only for myself, the next cut in Venezuela’s long, tragic
suicide. I chat with my friends, who continue to try and explain to the
mindless why their misery is a direct result of one bad idea built upon
the last in a great edifice of stupidity. Good men and women who are
stuck in a two-decade old debate from which there is no escape. I say
silent prayers for the next in the long line of political prisoners. I
look at photographs of places that I knew – beaches where I went and
restaurants that I frequented; covered in garbage or boarded up and
stinking. I watch the videos of the nightly sacking of supermarkets that
are fortuitous enough to have had a supply of something.
Tonight there are no lights. Like the New York City of Ayn Rand’s
“Atlas Shrugged”, the eyes of the country were plucked out to feed the
starving beggars in abandoned occupied buildings which were once luxury
apartments. They blame the weather – the government does – like the
tribal shamans of old who made sacrifices to the gods in the hopes of an
intervention. There is no food either; they tell the people to hold on,
to raise chickens on the terraces of their once-glamorous apartments.
There is no water – and they give lessons on state TV of how to wash
with a cup of water. The money is worthless; people now pay with
potatoes, if they can find them. Doctors operate using the light of
their smart phones; when there is power enough to charge them. Without
anesthesia, of course – or antibiotics, like the days before the advent
of modern medicine. The phone service has been cut – soon the internet
will go and an all-pervading darkness will fall over a feral land.
The marathon of destruction is almost finished; the lifeblood of the
nation is almost gone. No, there is nothing heroic or epic here; ruins
in the making are sad affairs – bereft of the comforting mantle of time
which lends intrigue and inevitability. And watching it has, for me,
been one of life’s great tragedies.
DAVID TOWER IN CARACAS. SAN BERNARDINO. VENEZUELA.
ESTA TORRE DE DAVID FUE DESOCUPADA Y ENTREGADA A SUS DUEÑOS, A CAMBIO DE UN CHEQUE QUE RECIBIERON LOS VILLEGAS, CUBACHAVISTAS COLOMBIANOS, HIJOS DE UN VIEJO CAMARADA LLAMADO VILLEGAS QUE MILITABA EN EL COMITE DE BASE DE SAN MARTIN Y CAPUCHINOS, EN CARACAS. ALLI SE REUNIA CON GUSTAVO MACHADO Y LOS DIRIGENTES DEL PARTIDO COMUNISTA DE VENEZUELA. NUNCA DIJO NADA, PERO CREIA QUE EL COMUNISMO LIBERARIA A VENEZUELA. SUS HIJOS, COMO HUGO CHAVEZ, TRAICIONARON SUS IDEAS Y LA CARTA DE JAMAICA DE SIMON BOLIVAR. EL SUICIDIO DE VENEZUELA SE LLAMA TRAICION.
Nota escrita por Carlos E Mijares el 12 de septiembre de 2016.
LOS ROQUES ES LA PLAYA Y PARAISO MAS BELLO DEL MUNDO.
VENEZUELA OFRECE AL TURISTA MUCHOS OTROS PARAISO Y PLAYAS, COMO
MOCHIMA, MARGARITA, FALCON, HIGUEROTE, LA GUAIRA, CHORONI, PLAYA MEDINA, EL YAQUE, PLAYA EL AGUA, PUERTO FRANCES, LA ARESTINGA, RIOS CAUJDOLOSOS E INMENSOS COMO EL ORINOCO, DELTA DEL ORINOCO, LAGOS, LAGUNAS, MORICHALES, ETC...
VISITE VENEZUELA. NO SOMOS COMUNISTAS NI COLOMBIANOS.
Come on those out there still possessed of a pioneering spirit, lets amass an invasion force and show the retards how to do it properly.
They’re black. That;s all you need to know. Therefore, keep them out of Europe.
Don’t obey the orders from above, if they are harmful to your people.
They not only lack the backbone to sort out their countries. They first, and foremost of all lack the brains to sort them out. And they are lazy as hell, if you’ve ever employed or worked with them. The would much prefer to sit there and watch the world go by while we are looking around for something to do. Neither they or many of our people understand the basics of this. They have an IQ that in our western nations is “borderline delayed or impaired.” Now THEY don’t know that, which is why they become angry when they can’t seem to get where we can get. Our countries are made for us, to our specifications. We should never be afraid to say this and to point it out so they cannot keep getting away with blaming us and accusing us of any fault for why they don’t get ahead. For God’s sake, they shouldn’t even be here. Only a truly sick society would accept hordes of them coming here, knowing they will rob, assault, and rape our culture until it and it’s people are a shadow of the brilliance the world once followed.
(i) another country; or
(ii) an organisation;